Whilst the Covid vaccines were based on a valid mechanism of action, the companies behind them (Pfizer, Johson and Johnson etc) are still the same as the ones that produce the psychiatric drugs.
Knowing how they act and conduct themselves in their studies to get psych drugs to market, there’s no reason to think they would act much differently with the vaccine (ignoring side effects, statistical manipulation etc).
It was also how people were coerced from companies that you must have the vaccine or lose your job or stranded in countries where they could not leave unless they had an injection, along with the idea that everyone in low risk groups (children, babies) must be vaccinated, that I think contributed towards animosity toward Covid vaccines.
Patrick Hahn provides a deep analysis on this topic in his book, and one case I remember was this one where, given her age, she didn’t seem to be hugely at risk: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/health-57853285
I don’t disagree in principle with vaccinations of course, but the way these companies prove efficacy to bring their psychiatric drugs to market should, at the very least, make one wary of how they prove efficacy for any other drug (especially without standard clinical trials), be it vaccine or not.
Whilst the Covid vaccines were based on a valid mechanism of action, the companies behind them (Pfizer, Johson and Johnson etc) are still the same as the ones that produce the psychiatric drugs.
Knowing how they act and conduct themselves in their studies to get psych drugs to market, there’s no reason to think they would act much differently with the vaccine (ignoring side effects, statistical manipulation etc).
It was also how people were coerced from companies that you must have the vaccine or lose your job or stranded in countries where they could not leave unless they had an injection, along with the idea that everyone in low risk groups (children, babies) must be vaccinated, that I think contributed towards animosity toward Covid vaccines.
Patrick Hahn provides a deep analysis on this topic in his book, and one case I remember was this one where, given her age, she didn’t seem to be hugely at risk: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/health-57853285
I don’t disagree in principle with vaccinations of course, but the way these companies prove efficacy to bring their psychiatric drugs to market should, at the very least, make one wary of how they prove efficacy for any other drug (especially without standard clinical trials), be it vaccine or not.
Off topic message:
Niall, please have a look at Pascal Lottas Neutrality studies interview with Mattias Desmet.
Im so glad that Pascal picked up my suggestion to interview him.
Yes, started the video yesterday, will finish today.
Big Pharma is going to have to step it up! I’m sure a few million for the ballroom could grease the wheels.