9 Comments
User's avatar
Moebius Infinity's avatar

Niall, are there any non Freudian options to move away from Narcisso-Fascism. As todays psychology is a judeo-zio-freudian feedback loop that keeps everyone jumping through the same hoops.

Well... thats a big claim, i know, but thats how i see todays judeo-freudian psychology, a self sustaining feedback loop that is rapidly overloading itself

Niall McLaren's avatar

I think you may have been led astray by the word "narcissism," I'm not using it to imply the Freudian model, just as a descriptive word. The biocognitive model is explicitly non-Freudian. In this file, the starting point is the universal drive to dominate as part of the male breeding strategy, except in humans, dominance has become an end in itself. The zionist urge to conquer 2m sqkm of West Asia and expel/slaughter 100million indigenous inhabitants is a perfect example. The central principle is that we all have the same biological machinery by virtue of being mammals but some people never learn to control it, or deliberately use it for their own purposes. Full details are set out in the book Narcisso-Fascism. Cheers, JMcL

Moebius Infinity's avatar

Thanks for this additional information, it shifted my perspective. I'll have to re-read.

Im trying to figure out how to get out of this situation, how to live parallel without being in the grips. Specially the 'Freudian loop' that I experience. Meaning, how the system works, how it keeps us in its grips. With DSM-V and political fences. Step out of the fence, and the system comes after people with DSM-V / Freudian tentacles. Well it also extends into media, and marketing.

I see many discussions about how the system works, but only very few discussions that seek solutions to get out of its grips, into a new situation that respects those who see things different.

Btw I only recently discovered you on Pascal Lottaz Neutrality Studies, so I still know very little about you.

And I hope this better explains the nature of my question.

Niall McLaren's avatar

That's fine, there are different streams to my work. First to show that modern psychiatry has no models of mental disorder and is therefore not a science. Its emphasis on biology has no formal justification. Second to fill that gap with the biocognitive model, and third, to test my model in an unrelated field. I chose politics because it interests me and frightens me, entirely the wrong people end up in power. But how do we get rid of them? That's a bit more difficult. Cheers, JMcL

Moebius Infinity's avatar

Exactly!

In my view this is part of that loop. It seems we are being kept busy with discussions about the symptoms.

Talk about the pain, where does it hurt, how bad does it hurt. Then blame the parents,

Or in politics blame the voter...

But never blame the corrupt appointed bullshitters that push the legislations for the donor / Epstein class.

Im glad I discovered you!

I really need to take this in one step at a time. In Pascals interview I hear you say things that shift the perspective in a subtle manner.

Anyway... I hope to see more interviews with you!

Im scrolling through your book titles and wonder where to get started.

Currently reading The Psychology of Totalitarianism by Mattias Desmet

Niall McLaren's avatar

If your background isn't psychiatry or psychology, start with the Narcisso-Fascism book, should make sense. Let me know what you think of it.

Moebius Infinity's avatar

Ok I'll start there.

Im dabbling in psychology for a long time to figure out how the system weaponised it against us. once I figured out how they do it I wanted to find ways to stop it. Just saying no is working quiet well, they simply can't handle it when you say no. But then they take out the Freudian whip.

I seek ways to redirect the systems aggression, and options to avoid it. Like bypassing eager career bullies.

The non hierarchical approach is nice. Like a bazaar.

For some reason i cant find much solutions in psy-space. But i could be looking in all the wrong places.